CTOs and engineering leads
Releases are slow. AI is on the roadmap. You need a sequence that does not break tenants.
SaaS modernization
Improve the platform you already run, then add AI on the same base. Upgrades, cleaner permissions, and new intelligence, without asking customers to wait for a rewrite.
This is the path when the product still makes money and a clean-slate rebuild is too risky. Proof lives in Array Corp and IbisHR.
Customers stay on the product while we improve it
Intelligence after the foundation is safe
Array Corp and IbisHR in production
The offer
Two jobs in one program: bring an older SaaS up to date, then add copilots and automation that would have been unsafe on the old mess.
Teams buy a rewrite when they are tired. They hire us when they still need revenue from the current product. Compare paths in AI retrofit vs rewrite.
Who it is for
If a full rewrite would freeze sales for a year, this is the safer conversation.
Releases are slow. AI is on the roadmap. You need a sequence that does not break tenants.
Customers still pay. You need new capability without a “come back next year” story.
The product is hard to use and hard to change. You want less busywork after the upgrade, not more risk.
What you get
The work that makes a later AI release possible, not a science project.
Services
Start with a review, then pick upgrade, AI, or both.
A clear picture of version gap, risk, and what to do first. Then a call to decide.
Request a reviewMove the product forward in slices so live customers keep working.
Copilots and automation on the cleaned-up product.
See AI integrationWhen both frameworks sit in your portfolio, we treat them as one program.
See framework modernizationChallenges
The rewrite pitch sounds clean. Production is not.
Speed
Every change is scary. We sequence upgrades so the next release is possible again.
Safety
One broken change can hit everyone. We keep accounts separate while we move.
Choice
A rewrite pauses revenue. We keep the live product and still add AI.
Visibility
You cannot automate what you cannot see. We add the hooks AI needs.
Why Solvefy
We have upgraded live multi-company products and added AI on the same engagement. The business keeps running.
Proof
Live platforms, not a greenfield rewrite.
1,000+ employees across locations while the platform kept moving.
Read full case study
How we work
Protect live customers. Unlock AI when the base can take it.
Step 1
Versions, custom work, customer count, and the workflow that hurts most.
Step 2
What must move first so later AI is safe.
Step 3
Flags, tests, and a way back if a slice fails.
Step 4
Copilots and automation on the paths you already trust.
Guides
Use these when someone asks “why not rewrite?”
If the platform is already healthy, start with copilots on the live product.
Framework-specific upgrade path for .NET multi-tenant products.
Once the product is stable, automate the busywork with people still in control.
Answers for people who own the product and the budget.
Yes. We upgrade those products and then add AI on the same codebase. You keep the business logic you already trust.
We plan for phased releases, feature flags, and a rollback path. The product stays up while we move it.
Most programs run a few months, with useful slices shipping along the way. A review call is how we size yours.
We still help. The same idea applies to other live SaaS stacks: upgrade in phases, then add AI without a rewrite.
Tell us the version you are on and what AI your buyers are asking for. We will map the next step.